Zeolite Zealot with 100k followers is mad at me: Using Confusion to Convince
Using Confusion & Chaos to Convince you that Aluminum is healthy.
All of us have heard of aluminum.
Whether we think about pokes 🥕, chemtrails, food additives or just a toxic metal… we all know putting aluminum in our body is a bad idea.
It follows that convincing people to eat aluminum to improve their health is a difficult task.
And this is why Zeolite Zealots need to use the Big Pharma Dance.
A Zeolite Zealot is someone who defends Zeolite against all logic & evidence.
There are two particularly problematic facts about Zeolite they must contend with:
Composition: Zeolite is composed of Aluminum & Silica
Structure: Zeolite is a nanomaterial due to its microporosity
Telling people ‘nano aluminum is healthy’ doesn’t work — so for Zeolite Zealots avoiding the basic facts of Zeolite is essential.
To be clear, I’m not telling anyone not to use Zeolite… I have two simple goals:
To reveal the information that Zeolite Zealots conceal — enabling consumers to make an informed decision based on accurate and complete information.
To offer Zeolite promoters the opportunity to address our concerns about Zeolite
Confusion: Distortion and Fallacies
Zeolite promoters cannot address our concerns openly because that would force them to clearly admit that Zeolite is a nano aluminum silicate.
To avoid basic facts about Zeolite… they need to create distortion & fallacies to confuse & distract.
Distortion can look like:
False Frames, Vagueness & Logical Fallacies
using fallacious logic to deny or ‘excuse’ the composition and structure of ZeoliteHalf-Truths/Lies of Omission, Plausible Lies & Technobabble
using confusion and obfuscation to muddy the water
spreading important-sounding yet irrelevant information to distract and confuseLogical Fallacies
making incorrect (and often irrelevant) statements that are hard to disproveDoublespeak & Vagueness
using vague implications to subliminally speak to your subconscious mind and steer your perception
All to construct a confusing narrative around why eating nano aluminum is healthy!
They use doublespeak vague implications, false frames, incorrect premises, logical fallacies and plausible-sounding lies… all to construct a confusing narrative to convince you that eating nano aluminum is healthy.
The next part is what ties it all together.
BS Asymmetry/Brandolini’s Law
Note: Thank you to DESPOT for posting this info.
The BS Asymmetry Law says that creating BS is easier and faster than debunking it.
It is far easier and faster to fabricate falsehoods than to expose falsehoods.
Zeolite Zealots exploit this as a tactic of confusion and persuasion.
The following concepts are common themes in this article, and allow Zeolite Zealots to combine the tactics above into a powerful strategy to confuse and convince:
Propaganda technique featuring rapid, repetitive and overwhelming talking points with no regard for truth or facts.
Reiteration Effect
Bias where we believe false information the more it is repeated to us.
“If you tell a lie long enough, it becomes the truth.” - Joseph Goebbels (allegedly)Woozle Effect/Evidence by Citation
This is an effect that occurs when information is falsely attributed to a citation — and the false information is spread because people do not check to see if the citation supports the information.
Zeolite Zealots overwhelm people with so much vague yet grand-sounding information, nobody would imagine it is all entirely fabricated.
What Zeolite Zealots always fear is speaking to someone who is a systematic, scientifically-literate individual with attention to detail.
I have been researching Zeolite for almost two years.
I have had countless discussions with Zeolite Zealots.
I have been presented with countless fallacies, misconceptions and lies.
Every single one of these fallacies and lies has helped me deepen my understanding of the truth about Zeolite.
And today we examine the claims of another Zeolite Zealot.
To be entirely clear… I believe the gentleman known as Disclosure Hub to be of good character. For the sake of brevity I refer to him as “Mr. Guru”. I do not believe he is knowingly or intentionally spreading incorrect information. I am simply documenting facts in this article.
How it started
My recent interview with D Booma San got a lot of attention. At the time of writing, it is currently ranked 4th from the top when searching “Zeolite” on Rumble.
In this interview I elaborated and presented evidence regarding the 5 Zeolite Facts.
Naturally the awareness we’re raising is concerning to those financially profiting from selling Zeolite.
After my interview with Booma, a certain account commented underneath the video on Rumble.
Mr. Guru comes to defend Zeolite: Comment #1
The following response is the first of 3 comments he wrote.
🤡 With all due respect, you have no idea what the **** you’re talking about. Zeolite is not a nano material. Zeolite is a **** rock like a geode. It’s not nano, it’s not micro, it’s not anything until you pulverize it to be the size of particle that you want. Second of all, when you get activated zeolite, it’s been through an acid bath that eats specifically the aluminum out of it. So it’s a clean structure so you need to get activated zeolite. You guys don’t know what the **** you’re talking about. There are plenty of studies out there peer reviewed that show the mechanisms of zeolite literally removing these hard to get rid of toxins. From your body. So again, zeolite is good, but you need to do your research on it. You guys clearly have not done your research. Again. How would you call something like zeolite literally a nano material? That doesn’t make any sense. It’s a **** rock. It’s a category of rock. There are so many types of zeolite. Literally you’re speaking out of your ****...
:)
First of all, let’s ignore the redacted profanity and ‘respectful’ insults.
Secondly, let’s break this entire comment down. Statement. by. statement.
Please note: DiclosureHub omitted the fact that they have a conflict of interest discussing Zeolite! The DisclosureHub website Shop leads to Green Mountain Greenery which sells Zeolite Clinoptilolite.
I invite DisclosureHub to publicly disclose their conflict of interest.
Addressing the Points:
🤡 Zeolite is not a nano material.
Notice, right off the bat… a statement is made.
I say Zeolite is a nanomaterial… he says that Zeolite is not a nanomaterial…
Therefore the next part of his message should contain evidence why Zeolite is not a nanomaterial.
He’s saying I’m wrong so he should prove it.
Instead, he says:
🤡 Zeolite is a **** rock like a geode
Zeolite is in fact a rock.
However this is entirely irrelevant.
I said Zeolite is a nanomaterial.
You said it isn’t a nanomaterial.
Where’s your proof?
I spent 2 entire minutes providing a full explanation as to why all Zeolites are nanomaterials.
If Mr. Guru had bothered to listen and learn, perhaps he would understand this fundamental fact.
Or he could simply engage his brain for 30 seconds — long enough to hop onto the Wikipedia page for Clinoptilolite and then look up what ‘microporous’ means.
🤡 It’s not nano, it’s not micro, it’s not anything until you pulverize it to be the size of particle that you want.
This is a half-truth and a clever twisting of reality.
As I explained in the above video — ALL Zeolites are nanomaterials due to their internal nanoscale dimensions. Their nano-sized pores and surface area.
Words have meaning.
According to the International Standards Organization the definition for nanomaterial includes materials with internal nano dimensions.
Legally, Zeolite is a nanomaterial. You can verify this yourself.
Wikipedia’s page on Nanomaterials includes this:
nanostructured materials […] such as zeolites and asbestos, are used as catalysts in a wide range of critical industrial chemical reactions.
You would expect someone who promotes Zeolite so vehemently to know the basic facts of their miracle product or at least know the meaning of the words they use.
Let’s continue — he then says:
🤡 Second of all, when you get activated zeolite, it’s been through an acid bath that eats specifically the aluminum out of it. So it’s a clean structure so you need to get activated zeolite. You guys don’t know what the **** you’re talking about.
This paragraph is a mess of confusion and fallacies.
The only way to debunk such confusion is to learn the science.
Firstly, let’s assume that this is true. That the Zeolite Mr. Guru promotes on their channel has been treated with acid intended to remove aluminum from the Zeolite.
To my knowledge, the Zeolite company Mr. Guru promotes provides no information, evidence or research to support their claims.
Feel free to look for yourself: https://greenmountaingardening.myshopify.com/products/zeoguard
Mr. Guru claims he has recently added a database of studies where ‘all the studies are up’, yet the webpage simply says “Coming soon”.
Mr. Guru is referring to a concept known as dealumination.
Usually, dealuminating any Zeolite will destabilize the structure and destroy the Zeolite — turning it into individual components: aluminum and silica.
However, if done carefully it is possible to remove some aluminum.
There is no proof that Clinoptilolite can be fully dealuminated without being destabilized and destroyed.
Perhaps Mr. Guru would know this if he took the time to educate himself instead of making false claims.
I invite anyone to present proof that aluminum can be fully removed from Clinoptilolite without destroying it.
Furthermore, it would be expected that only 50% of the Al can be extracted without destroying the zeolite. - Source
Note that some claim to have achieved higher dealumination rates than this — however that doesn’t mean the Clinoptilolite is viable for use since it starts having defects, desilication and loss of crystallinity. The above study was able to achieve 46% dealumination utilising a novel approach.
So assuming some of the aluminum is removed… so what?
A poison is a poison.
Additionally, you would think that by removing aluminum, you’ve solved/reduced the toxicity problems with Zeolite… yet it’s still a nano silica. There is plenty of proof of how toxic nano silica is in the body.
Additionally, industry tells us that dealuminated Zeolite usually has increased surface area and therefore unsurprisingly is more chemically active (thus used as a superior catalyst)…. this means that you’ve partially decreased the aluminum problem and simultaneously made Zeolite even more reactive, biologically active and nanotoxic.
Furthermore, dealuminating Clinoptilolite may result in even worse complications:
this process also generates framework defects and partially detached aluminum species (Lewis acid sites), which can influence stability and reactivity - Source
It appears that these species remain in the Zeolite structure and impact the acidity and chemical reactivity of Zeolite which is utilised industrially.
Al leaching leads to […] the appearance of extra-framework aluminum species (octahedrally and five-coordinated Al species) present in the pore system. These species create strong acid Lewis sites. - Source
Extra-framework Al Lewis sites represent extra-framework Al species located in the zeolite channel system. - Source
So to recap:
No proof aluminum can be fully removed from Clinoptilolite.
Aluminum is toxic — a poison is a poison.
If Zeolite just magically didn’t contain aluminum — it’s still a nanotoxic silica.
Partially removing aluminum from Clinoptilolite can release aluminum into the Zeolite pore system, making the structure more reactive and thus more toxic.
It seems that Mr. Guru doesn’t know the basic structure of Clinoptilolite, nor does he understand the consequences of treating Zeolite with acid.
🤡 There are plenty of studies out there peer reviewed that show the mechanisms of zeolite literally removing these hard to get rid of toxins. From your body.
OK and?
Research says that 🩸🥕 (pokes) are safe and effective.
Does that justify poisoning yourself?
“I want to eat this poison that is toxic because it will help me remove toxins.”
If I didn’t know better, I would think that Mr. Guru is promoting the mainstream system.
Additional comments:
It is obvious that Zeolite is a great tool in industry, sewage, kitty litter and more.
There’s plenty of research promoting Zeolite in animals, and in a future article I will reveal exactly why every single one of those experiments is misleading and inapplicable to ‘human’ men and women.
I’m still yet to see any evidence of Zeolite itself being excreted from the body after ingestion.
And I’m still yet to see any valid justification for ingesting a nano aluminum silicate utilised in highly questionable industrial applications such as carrots, drug delivery and biosensors while being funded and promoted by Big Petrol and Big Pharma?
🤡 So again, zeolite is good, but you need to do your research on it. You guys clearly have not done your research.
The irony.
Mr. Guru says we should do our research on Zeolite...
And yet Mr. Guru is the one that doesn’t even know the basic fundamental structure of Zeolite nor the basic facts about its chemical composition.
🤡 Again. How would you call something like zeolite literally a nano material? That doesn’t make any sense. It’s a **** rock. It’s a category of rock.
Mr. Guru repeats that Zeolite is a rock... which is irrelevant because Zeolite being a rock does not justify consuming it.
Asbestos is a silicate mineral extracted from rocks.
And where do metals such as arsenic, mercury, lead and cadmium come from?
Rocks!
Yes, that’s right, these metals are mined.
“Mining developed to extract rocks from the Earth and obtain the minerals within them, including metals” - Source
This is basic education.
I’m concerned for all my American brothers and sisters that have to struggle with the terrible education system that doesn’t teach basic fundamentals.
I invite anyone who thinks rocks are magically healthy to munch on rocks containing chrysolite for asbestos, arsenopyrite for arsenic, cinnabar for mercury and galena for lead.
Since I know Mr. Guru is reading this and may actually start munching rocks laden with metals, definitely do not eat rocks. This is not medical advice. I am being sarcastic.
🤡 There are so many types of zeolite. Literally you’re speaking out of your ****...
Yes, there are many types of Zeolite.
The amount of Zeolite types is irrelevant to the toxicity of one or any Zeolite.
We’re all talking about Clinoptilolite.
And Clinoptilolite is toxic.
In fact, I addressed this exact evasive talking point.
If only Mr. Guru took the time to watch and learn before hastily writing up uneducated falsehoods.
I have provided evidence for every single one of my claims… most of which are just simple facts an un-fluoridated 10 year old could figure out for themselves.
Mr. Guru Doubles Down: Comment #2
Mr. Guru then followed up with this comment:
🤡
Just finished the whole video... Heres some answers for your questions from the 50 studies ive accumulated in my database:
1. Why ingest zeolite? Is it nano toxic?
Zeolite binds heavy metals (lead, mercury, cadmium) in GI tract. "Nano toxic" means particles <100nm entering cells—zeolite is 5μm (50x larger), stays in digestive tract. GRAS status, LD50 >10g/kg, 12-week RCT (n=52) showed zero adverse events, improved gut barrier (zonulin -30%).
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483571/
2. Does zeolite cause oxidative stress?
No—REDUCES it. Studies show SOD +42%, glutathione +38%, reduced inflammation. Binds toxins that generate oxidative damage.
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32193140/
3. Who funds zeolite studies?
Universities (Graz, Brescia, Athens) and government agencies (Mineralogical Society of America, EU regulatory)—not supplement companies. Published in high-impact journals.
Study: https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2001.45
4. Does it kill gut bacteria?
No. Binds only metal cations (Pb²⁺, Hg²⁺)—NOT organic compounds. 12-week RCT improved gut barrier. IBS trials succeeded. 60 years veterinary safety (EU E568 approval).
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483571/
5. Does it cause weight gain?
No. Not absorbed, no calories, no metabolic effects. 12-week trial (5.55g daily): zero weight-related adverse events.
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483571/
6. Is aluminum dangerous? Does acid help?
Aluminum locked in crystal—cannot leach. 12-week studies: NO serum aluminum elevation. "Acid bath" enhances binding 25-31% safely (XRD-confirmed intact structure).
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29413092/
7. Does it cause heart issues?
No. Phase I/IIa (n=41): reduced cholesterol 20-25%, LDL 23%. Normal BP, heart rate. Reduced cardiotoxic cesium-137 (65%), strontium-90 (58%). Zero cardiac adverse events.
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28605233/
The average consumer will likely become overwhelmed at this amount of information, the technical terms and the official-looking links.
And that’s exactly what this is may be meant to do.
In my article discussing the Zeolite Mafia, I expose this tactic.
Now that we’ve recognized this tactic (whether intentional or not by Mr. Guru) — let’s address each point, one by one.
Also notice this:
🤡 Just finished the whole video
As we suspected Mr. Guru was parroting his talking points before even listening to what we had to say.
Perhaps if he took the time to learn and educate himself, he would have sounded better in his initial comment.
Addressing the points: Comment #2
🤡
1. Why ingest zeolite? Is it nano toxic?
Zeolite binds heavy metals (lead, mercury, cadmium) in GI tract. “Nano toxic” means particles <100nm entering cells—zeolite is 5μm (50x larger), stays in digestive tract. GRAS status, LD50 >10g/kg, 12-week RCT (n=52) showed zero adverse events, improved gut barrier (zonulin -30%).
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483571/
Ahh… notice another beautiful tactic.
Instead of addressing the question of Zeolite nanotoxicity, the question is masterfully mixed with Zeolite promotion and more incorrect claims.
Instead of addressing the fact that all Zeolite is a nanomaterial in toxicological and industrial contexts — he asks the question “is it nano toxic?” then doesn’t answer the question — instead making another incorrect statement.
Mr. Guru claims that nanotoxicity is only limited to particles smaller than 100nm, which is incorrect. Nanotoxicologists have been warning that the nanoscale should be extended to 1000nm and beyond given high surface area for toxicological purposes for decades... only to be completely ignored by Big Industry and regulatory bodies.
Confining the definition of nanomaterials to below 100 nm is arguably one of the numerous legal loopholes that regulatory bodies worldwide have, allowing the use of dangerous nanomaterials in consumer products.
The FDA, which was involved in the formulation of the inaccurate sub-100 nm NNI definition, has not adopted any “official” regulatory definition for nanotechnology or nanoscale.
[…]
As stated previously, various other governmental agencies also continue to use the vague NNI definition based on a sub-100 nm size. Clearly, as elaborated in this chapter, such definitions based on size or dimensions alone fall short on both scientific and legal grounds.
Source
If Mr. Guru wants to ingest his nano aluminum that’s his issue but I would ask him to please refrain from propagating mainstream pro-nanomaterial narratives.
🤡 “Nano toxic” [means particles] entering cells
Nanotoxicity is not exclusive to the ability of nanoparticles in penetrating biological protective barriers. The high surface area of nanomaterials causes unique chemical properties and reactivity. That reactivity makes nanomaterials toxic whether they penetrate your cells or not.
If Zeolite was not a nanomaterial it would not have its unique ionic properties.
In the same sentence, he continues:
🤡 zeolite is 5μm
And yet Mr. Guru himself said:
🤡 it’s not anything until you pulverize it to be the size of particle that you want.
Perhaps he means the Zeolite that he promotes is 5 micron.
Except the product on the website he promotes claims to be 2 micron.
However, no micronization process can guarantee a set particle size. It’s usually a size range. This is standard information, that Mr. Guru would know if he did his research.
🤡 GRAS status
GRAS stands for Generally Recognized as Safe.
This is a common Zeolite-promoter talking point: an appeal to the authority of the FDA.
However as always with Zeolite Zealots — even their fallacious talking points are based on lies/falsehoods.
Zeolite (and other aluminum silicates) are given GRAS status ONLY for use as an anti-caking agent in animal feed as long as it is 2% of the feed or less.
And from the official database:
I’m curious why Mr. Guru cares what the FDA says? It seems that he is very fixated on mainstream narratives.
🤡 LD50 >10g/kg, 12-week RCT (n=52) showed zero adverse events, improved gut barrier (zonulin -30%).
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483571/
Just quickly, lets look at the ‘proof’ Mr. Guru has of these claims.
Here’s a screenshot of the study:
🔍
What does this have to do with Zeolite?
Let’s access the full text and see if it even mentions Zeolite.
I invite you to verify this for yourself. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483571/
Why am I teaching a grown adult how to read?
So now you see how in one paragraph, Mr. Guru crammed in a cocktail of falsehoods, irrelevant information and some more falsehoods.
But you know what… I’m going to do Mr. Guru a massive favor.
I’m actually going to reveal where he got that number from
🤡 (zonulin -30%).
A 30% decrease in Zonulin was found in this study here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4617723/
So just out of curiosity, let’s go to the Conflict of Interest section.
As covered in Zeolite & Using Confusion to Convince, Panaceo sells Zeolite.
🤡
2. Does zeolite cause oxidative stress?
No—REDUCES it. Studies show SOD +42%, glutathione +38%, reduced inflammation. Binds toxins that generate oxidative damage.
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32193140/
Given our experience with the previous ‘study’ Mr. Guru linked, let’s take a look:
Again, let’s access the full paper and search for the word Zeolite.
Mr. Guru… are you OK?
Here’s some more vital education that could enrich Mr. Guru, if he listened.
🤡
3. Who funds zeolite studies?
Universities (Graz, Brescia, Athens) and government agencies (Mineralogical Society of America, EU regulatory)—not supplement companies. Published in high-impact journals.
Study: https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2001.45
I really don’t need to reply with words, do I?
We just looked at a Zeolite study funded by a Zeolite company a minute ago:
Regarding the link Mr. Guru cited, here it is:
Again, in the interest of good-spirited discussion, I’m going to give Mr. Guru a pass and do his work for him.
It seems this is what he was trying to reference?
Except this paper does not mention the funding of Zeolite research.
As this article continues, it will become more and more apparent how heavily involved Zeolite ‘supplement’ companies are in Zeolite research.
🤡
4. Does it kill gut bacteria?
No. Binds only metal cations (Pb²⁺, Hg²⁺)—NOT organic compounds. 12-week RCT improved gut barrier. IBS trials succeeded. 60 years veterinary safety (EU E568 approval).
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483571/
First of all, Zeolite Clinoptilolite is an antibiotic… it absolutely does kill gut bacteria.
The link Mr. Guru cites is a copy-paste of a link he used earlier:
This paper has no relation to Zeolite at all so why is he posting it?
So here we go again, I’m going to be doing Mr. Guru’s work for him.
🤡 12-week RCT improved gut barrier. IBS trials succeeded.
I found two IBS Zeolite papers.
This is the 12 week trial: Safety and efficacy of purified clinoptilolite-tuff treatment in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: Randomized controlled trial
This experiment is using a patented Zeolite product sold by the sponsor of the trials… GlOCK Health.
You’d think that this is a bad enough conflict of interest — but it gets worse.
Fun fact: GLOCK Health was started by the man that founded Glock firearms.
According to Wikipedia his second wife was 51 years younger than him and is part of the medical advisory board for GLOCK Health. She has also been photographed with many European film celebrities.
For fun… let’s take a look at the second IBS Zeolite experiment I found: PMA – Zeolite (Clinoptilolite) in the Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome – a Non-Interventional Study
Reminder: Mr. Guru wants you to believe that Zeolite companies aren’t funding Zeolite research.
🤡 60 years veterinary safety (EU E568 approval).
Let’s look at E568.
When Googling, you will find this document hosted on the official EU Law website.
There are four things to address here:
Language
Usage
Duration
Fattening
Language
Mr. Guru claims that Clinoptilolite has been used in veterinary.
Veterinary refers to disease in animals. This means that Mr. Guru is claiming that E568 or perhaps other clinoptilolite is approved by the EU Safety Authority to cure animals.
Usage:
According to the document, E568 is a natural clinoptilolite used as a ‘technological’ feed additive for animals in the form of a pellet binder or anticaking agent.
10000 mg per kg is 1% of the feed product.
Does that sound like Clinoptilolite is being used to prevent disease/heal animals?
Dear Mr. Guru, words have meaning. Please use them properly.
If Mr. Guru wants to appeal to the authority of regulatory bodies he should be talking about E554 which is an aluminum silicate famously used by McDonalds.
Duration
Mr. Guru claims it was used for 60 years:
So when was it initially approved?
According to this document from 2005 and corroborated by the initial approval document:
E568 Clinoptilolite was approved for the feed of five animal species in September 2000.
In 2005 the approval was extended.
In 2013 the approval was expanded to all animals and extended till 2023.
In 2023 the approval was renewed at the request of ZEOCEM (a subsidiary of GLOCK).
2026 - 2000 = 26 years. Not 60 years.
Fun facts about ZEOCEM:
According to this analysis ZEOCEM produce between 200,000 and 400,000 tons of Zeolite per year
Their history started with a cement plant.
Their stated mission is to “promote Zeolite to support sustainable development of mankind”
They are major players in the Zeolite market along with many IZC sponsors
They sell Zeolite. A lot of it.
Fattening
I also noticed that in the documentation about E568, numerous documents mention fattening livestock using Clinoptilolite.
This is a topic for a future article, however I didn’t want to conclude that “animals for fattening” meant that the Zeolite is meant to fatten them without more proof.
Yet, in 2025, the Eurpoean Food Safety Authority released: Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of clinoptilolite of volcanic origin for all terrestrial animal species (IMERYS Talc Europe).
In this paper they say that their panel concluded that Clinoptilolite of volcanic origin (E567) is ‘safe and effective’ at 2% for fattening poultry and pigs.
They also claim that clinoptilolite is safe for consumers and the environment which I’m sure will make Mr. Guru very happy.
Yeah, these are the same people that told people for decades that talc (a mined silicate often contaminated with asbestos) is ‘inert’ and now say it’s ‘not absorbed in the gut’.
‘Inert’ ‘not absorbed’ hmm, where have I heard those excuses for eating toxins before?
What makes this whole situation even funnier is the company that requested the EU Commission to review Clinoptilolite safety and efficacy in animal feed.
IMERYS Talc Europe are the European division of Imerys. So who is IMERYS?
They sell Zeolites for use in many industrial applications, including filtration aids in the pharmaceutical field.
What else do they sell?
I wonder why the Rothschilds would be interested in Zeolite, Bentonite, Diatomaceous Earth and relatives of nanocarbons (Carbon Black & Graphite).
Lies of the ‘Safety Industry’
This section is not directly related to Mr. Guru, but an important commentary on the authority he is appealing to.
When a food safety commission says that a panel ‘reviewed a substance and gave their scientific opinion on its safety and efficacy’ — you would think that the panel collated and studied diverse research and information from across many sources and evaluated it.
Except… the EU safety paper clearly states that the assessment is based on data submitted by the applicant i.e. IMERYS.
That is a conflict of interest.
You’re telling me that the panel didn’t consult a single source outside of what the Rothschild company gave them?
Ok, but surely IMERYS themselves collated independent research from across the years to present to the panel?
Well, when you dig into the documentation regarding the IMERYS request on the EFSA website, look at the supporting documents and download the dossier… this is what you will find:
The safety studies were contracted and sponsored by IMERYS themselves.
Information regarding who was involved in these studies is fully redacted, however the sponsor is very clear.
Example:
Dear Mr. Guru — in light of this information I strongly believe that whether the EU approve or ban a substance is irrelevant to the safety of that substance.
🤡
5. Does it cause weight gain?
No. Not absorbed, no calories, no metabolic effects. 12-week trial (5.55g daily): zero weight-related adverse events.
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483571/
Before addressing the claims, I have a question:
Why is Mr. Guru copy-pasting the same unrelated ‘research’ link for the THIRD time?
I don’t want to make hurtful suggestions as to why he is doing this… so instead I shall simply ask why? Is this what ‘science’, transparency and education looks like?
🤡 12-week trial (5.55g daily)
I searched and to my knowledge there is no Clinoptilolite study that administered the rather odd number 5.55g.
Also, as per the information regarding the Zeolite additive he referenced — Clinoptilolite is used for fattening livestock
This topic is planned for a future article so I wasn’t going to comment too much on the topic — but I had to when I saw Mr. Guru’s own information proves my point.
And again, none of this explains why we should believe munching Zeolite is safe, when it is a nano aluminum silicate that is utilised in questionable industrial applications such as carrots, drug delivery and biosensors while being funded and promoted by Big Petrol and Big Pharma!
🤡
6. Is aluminum dangerous? Does acid help?
Aluminum locked in crystal—cannot leach. 12-week studies: NO serum aluminum elevation. “Acid bath” enhances binding 25-31% safely (XRD-confirmed intact structure).
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29413092/
As discussed, there is no existing way to remove all aluminum from Clinoptilolite without destroying the structure — because all Zeolites are composed of ALUMINUM & silica.
🤡 “Acid bath” enhances binding 25-31% safely (XRD-confirmed intact structure).
Enhanced binding is irrelevant to the fact that Clinoptilolite still contains aluminum and silica… and is a nanomaterial with associated biological toxicity.
If there was a poison that gave you the ability to fly for 24 hours but then killed you the next day, would you eat that poison?
And again, if Mr. Guru is serious, he should provide studies to back his claims.
Real studies.
Once again, when we open the link he presents we get something completely unrelated to Zeolite:
🤡 Aluminum locked in crystal—cannot leach. 12-week studies: NO serum aluminum elevation.
Let’s address this piece by piece.
🤡 Aluminum locked in crystal
This is doublespeak. The word ‘lock’ evokes the idea that the aluminum is in a cage under lock and key. Yet that’s obviously not true.
Saying that ‘aluminum is safe because it’s bound/locked up’ invokes a false premise.
Many people seem to think metals like aluminum are toxic because they hold a little hammer in their toolbelt and run around bashing cells up.
That is not true.
These toxins are chemically toxic. This means that their presence in the body causes chemical interference with the body and results in chemical damage.
Note: chemical reactivity increases dramatically in high surface area materials i.e. nanomaterials.
For example, a study found that Aluminum Chloride caused intestinal barrier dysfunction and inflammation due to oxidative stress which results from chemical reactions with cellular molecules and bodily components.
Aluminum Chloride supposedly has an 0.05% absorption rate in the gut.
Aluminum Chloride is not absorbed, digested or bioavailable in any serious amount — yet it’s toxic.
Whether you believe in the ‘science’ of the mainstream medical system or not — this ‘science’ is used by Zeolite promoters and itself undeniably proves Zeolite is toxic.
Toxins are usually toxic to anything that comes into contact with them.
Which is why…
Aluminum Hydroxide (the most common vaccine adjuvant) has an absorption rate of 0.02% in the gut — and it is still toxic.
And…
Aluminum Oxide has an absorption rate of 0.04% in the gut — and it is still toxic.
Because shocking as this may be to Mr. Guru — toxic metals do damage inside the body.
🤡 Cannot leach
Irrelevant. As above, a poisonous toxin is toxic whether it breaks down or not.
Not only is this argument irrelevant, it’s also incorrect, it does leach.
🤡 NO serum aluminum elevation.
Irrelevant.
No serum aluminum elevation means they didn’t find an increase of aluminum in the blood.
This exact gaslighting is what the mainstream uses to justify aluminum in your food, cosmetics and 🩸🥕.
Here’s a classic example:
“Systemic Al[uminum] absorption is very low and in normal individuals almost all absorbed Al is excreted from the body.” - Source
For the sake of future reference, I will include two studies I’m aware of that make this ‘no serum aluminum elevation’ claim:
Novel, oxygenated clinoptilolite material efficiently removes aluminium from aluminium chloride-intoxicated rats in vivo funded by Panaceo
Safety and efficacy of purified clinoptilolite-tuff treatment in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: Randomized controlled trial funded by Glock Health
Let’s give Mr. Guru a pass and assume that this claim is true.
So what?
A poisonous toxin is toxic whether it enters the bloodstream or not.
When you eat poison, that poison enters your body — it goes through your gut and then through your intestines — if you put poisons in your body, you will be poisoned.
None of this justifies munching a nano aluminum silicate utilised in questionable industrial applications such as carrots, drug delivery and biosensors while being funded and promoted by Big Petrol and Big Pharma!
Discussing Absorption
In the topic of Zeolite — bioavailability, absorption and digestion are often used interchangeably to describe materials entering the blood through the intestinal walls.
Zeolite Zealots claim that Zeolite is not absorbed/does not enter the bloodstream — and imply that somehow justifies ingesting a poison.
The problem with this logic is that there are plenty of poisons that are poisonous despite supposedly not being absorbed.
This is seen with many forms of aluminum. Below are various forms of aluminum and their rate of absorption in the gut:
aluminum citrate: 0.08%
aluminum chloride: 0.05%
aluminum nitrate: 0.05%
aluminum sulphate 0.21%
aluminum hydroxide 0.03%
aluminum oxide 0.02%
sodium aluminum silicate 0.12%
FD&C red 40 aluminum lake 0.09%
Although Zeolite Zealots act like they already have too much aluminum in their brains — I think they would still be extremely reluctant to ingest any of these poisons.
🤡
7. Does it cause heart issues?
No. Phase I/IIa (n=41): reduced cholesterol 20-25%, LDL 23%. Normal BP, heart rate. Reduced cardiotoxic cesium-137 (65%), strontium-90 (58%). Zero cardiac adverse events.
Study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28605233/
Finally a link that leads to something relating to Clinoptilolite.
First of all Dyslipidemia is abnormal levels of lipids in the bloodstream… i.e. ‘too much cholesterol’ which has absolutely nothing to do with Zeolite causing anemia.
This is more irrelevant information presented as ‘facts’ from Mr. Guru.
However, I am so glad Mr. Guru shared this paper.
It examines whether Clinoptilolite may be used as a bile acid sequestrant to reduce cholesterol in the blood.
Here’s some background info:
Cholesterol is used to make bile acid by the body.
Bile acid helps us absorb fat and fat soluble nutrients.
Bile acid is naturally reused by the body.
Bile acid sequestrants are statin alternatives.
Bile acid sequestrants prevent the bile from being reused and instead force it to be excreted. This forces the liver to make more bile… which requires cholesterol and therefore depletes cholesterol in the blood.
Essentially these chemicals rob the body of an essential material and tax the liver by forcing it to produce more bile acid.
The arrogance of the mainstream medical approach is always astounding.
Unsurprisingly, bile acid sequestrant side effects include:
Decreased absorption of nutrients and other drugs
Constipation/intestinal obstruction
Indigestion
Now let’s read some quotes from the study Mr. Guru linked:
Considering its ion exchange properties, we hypothesize that clinoptilolite may change ionic content, pH, and buffering capacity of the gastrointestinal secretions, creating a less favorable environment for cholesterol absorption.
Artificially interfering with the gut — what could go wrong?
clinoptilolite may also act as bile acid sequestrants and interfere with micellar adaptation of intestinal cholesterol, effectively reducing its absorption into enterocytes. This would presumably reduce the amount of cholesterol delivered to the liver […].
This is effectively saying that Clinoptilolite may prevent reabsorption of bile acid thus preventing its re-use by the body.
And what did they conclude?
This study shows that oral administration of clinoptilolite in doses up to 9 g for 8 weeks is efficacious for temporarily improving lipid profile in people with Dyslipidemia.
‘Improving’ as in “we reduced the cholesterol in your blood that your body needs because our pharma deities know what is right for your body better than your own body”.
On the bright side, Clinoptilolite is just as effective as many pharma drugs.
About 25% decrease in LDL cholesterol reported in this study is similar to the effects of 40 mg of fluvastatin, 10–20 mg of lovastatin, 20–40 mg of pravastatin, and 10 mg of simvastatin (20–30% decrease)
And who is behind these drugs:
Fluvastatin brand Lescol is manufactured by Novartis.
Lovastatin was discovered by Merck. A funder of the International Zeolite Conference.
Pravastatin was developed by a company that later became Daiichi Sankyo. Daiichi just happens to be one of the pharma companies involved in the vitamin cartels of the 90s.
The irony is that while Mr. Guru attempted to cite this study to ‘prove’ that Zeolite is safe, the study itself admits in-part that there are safety concerns:
Potential safety concerns include negative effects on the lungs (fibrosis, mesothelioma), central nervous system (neurotoxicity associated with aluminum), and gastrointestinal system (interference with absorption of minerals and fat-soluble vitamins), and specifically in the context of dyslipidemia, whether intake of clinoptilolite may cause weight gain
Yes, this quote is directly from the full-text document:
This paper recognises that Clinoptilolite could cause weight gain.
And yet it is Mr. Guru himself that claims ‘Zeolite does not cause weight gain’:
If only he read the studies he himself posted.
Note: If you are not already aware, please investigate the truth about cholesterol and statins.
I want to thank Mr. Guru so much for sharing this research paper with us, this is yet another weird and wacky way that Zeolite interferes and disrupts our body and another mechanism that could explain Zeolite adverse reports.
Mr. Guru… Please Read: Comment #3
🤡
I refreshed the page, I see you actually commented. Thanks for replying. Yes, zeolite is an aluminum silicate, but acid-washed zeolite (clinoptilolite) has the aluminum removed—that's the whole point of the purification process.
Calling zeolite "nanotoxic" because it has nanopores is fundamentally wrong. That's like calling a sponge microscopic because it has microscopic holes. Nanotoxicity occurs when particles themselves are nano-sized and enter places they shouldn't. The nanopores are what make zeolite effective—they trap heavy metals like a molecular sieve.
Here's the critical distinction: micronized powder ≠ nanoparticles. Micronized zeolite cannot enter cells. The nanotoxicity studies you're referencing apply exclusively to synthetic nano zeolites engineered at the nano scale—not natural zeolite geodes that are pulverized and acid-washed.
Big pharma's injection-grade zeolites and biosensors use synthetic nanoparticles. Natural zeolite would need to be crushed to billionths of a meter—which is technically near-impossible and economically absurd. 99.9% of nano-sized zeolite is synthetic because creating true nanoparticles from geodes is extraordinarily difficult.
The confusion stems from conflating synthetic versus natural sources. Two completely different materials.
I appreciate you standing so heavy on your side. You remind me of myself, but sometimes the information isn't as strong as the heart.
Let’s go through this step by step
🤡 Yes, zeolite is an aluminum silicate, but acid-washed zeolite (clinoptilolite) has the aluminum removed—that’s the whole point of the purification process.
We responded to all those points in the previous section.
Here’s the summary:
There is no proof that Clinoptilolite can be fully dealuminated without being destabilized and destroyed.
Aluminum is toxic — a poison is a poison.Partially removing aluminum from Clinoptilolite can increase toxicity by increasing surface area and chemical reactivity.
Partially removing aluminum from Clinoptilolite can release aluminum into the Zeolite pore system, making the structure more reactive and thus more toxic.
Again, I am yet to see any proof from the Zeolite company Mr. Guru promotes.
They do not include research, experiments or any proof of what they do.
https://greenmountaingardening.myshopify.com/products/zeoguardGreen Mountain Greenery are the only Zeolite company to my knowledge that claim their Zeolite has been dealuminated.
🤡 Calling zeolite “nanotoxic” because it has nanopores is fundamentally wrong. That’s like calling a sponge microscopic because it has microscopic holes.
This is a blatant attempt to redefine science.
Firstly, notice that in the same paragraph he now admits that Zeolite is nanostructured.
🤡 The nanopores are what make zeolite effective
Funny, I remember saying that exact fact in the interview.
Earlier he was saying “it’s not nano, it’s a rock”.
Now he’s admitting “yes, it has nanoscale dimensions, BUT it’s not toxic”
Before we disprove his ‘sponge’ analogy let’s recognise that Zeolite ‘trapping heavy metals’ is irrelevant if it is a poison. Mr. Guru is again trying to distract from the issue.
🤡 Nanotoxicity occurs when particles themselves are nano-sized and enter places they shouldn’t.
This is blatantly incorrect.
Firstly, nanoscale properties are not limited to 100 or 1000 nanometers.
“All definitions of nanotechnology based on size or dimensions should be dismissed. […] There is simply no scientific basis or logic to limiting all nanotechnology to a sub-100 nm limitation; it is illogical, random and foolish. Moreover, “nano” is not simply a metric of length, and nanoscale research does not accept such rigid limitations on dimensionality” - Raj Bawa, MS, PhD
Nanotoxicity is mainly as a result of high surface area, and resulting chemical and biological reactivity.
The large surface area of nanomaterials results in their increased chemical reactivity and biological activity. - Source & citation
And that chemical and biological reactivity disrupts our natural biology.
The greater surface area to volume ratio of these particles causes their higher chemical reactivity and results in increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
Indeed, the NPs surface area is a key factor in their intrinsic toxicity because of the interaction of their surfaces with biological system - Source
So yes, when the pores in a ‘sponge’ are spewing out poison and corrupting everything they touch it is toxic.
🤡 micronized powder ≠ nanoparticles
High surface area aluminum & silica = metal nanomaterial = high biological reactivity = toxic.
🤡 Micronized zeolite cannot enter cells
Irrelevant.
🤡 The nanotoxicity studies you’re referencing apply exclusively to synthetic nano zeolites engineered at the nano scale—not natural zeolite geodes that are pulverized and acid-washed.
It appears that Mr. Guru has never studied nanotoxicity before. Neither has he looked at any of the relevant scientific references. Nor does it seem that he comprehended anything we talked about in the video.
Also, Zeolite is not geode.
Mr. Guru is repeating this falsehood a lot, so let’s address it.
Geodes are hollow rock formations with minerals and often crystals within them.
Geodes are hollow, vaguely spherical rocks, in which masses of mineral matter (which may include crystals) are secluded - Source
Zeolite is a crystalline rock. Not a hollow rock formation, not a geode.
Zeolites sometimes can be found within geodes though.
This is generally what Zeolite geodes sold on the market look like:
The above geode contains Scolecite, Stilbite and Chalcedony (which is quartz).
This is a geode containing Clinoptilolite and Laumontite.
Clearly there is a mixture of Zeolites and other minerals forming in these structures in addition to the outer casing itself which is usually composed of silica.
When not majorly contaminated — this is what Clinoptilolite looks like:
Zeolites are not geodes. Some geodes contain Zeolite… However geodes clearly aren’t geared towards industrial use as a source for mineral powders.
I invite you to Google “difference between zeolite and geode” because that’s all it would have taken for Mr. Guru to learn that he is mistaken.
🤡 [Zeolite that is] pulverized and acid-washed.
Mr. Guru has not provided any valid proof of his claims regarding this magical ‘acid-treated Zeolite’. As far as we know, there is no toxicological or safety research on acid treated Clinoptilolite. Presenting that data is the responsibility of the company claiming to use this method.
Mr. Guru has not addressed any of the fundamental points about Zeolite, instead he seems dedicated to distracting with fallacies and uneducated misconceptions.
🤡 Big pharma’s injection-grade zeolites and biosensors use synthetic nanoparticles.
Note: carbon paste electrodes are an electrochemical sensor.
Note: 5-Fluorouracil is a chemotherapy drug.
Zeolite in vaccines is perhaps a topic to cover in the future. There are more similarities than you would imagine.
🤡 Natural zeolite would need to be crushed to billionths of a meter—which is technically near-impossible and economically absurd.
1 nanometer is a billionth of a meter. Billionths of a meter would be angstrom, not nano.
Making particles nanosized isn’t near-impossible — it’s called milling.
And it is economically profitable… your supplements, makeup, sunscreen, baby formula and food products often contain nanoparticles from milled powders.
Nano powders are actually pretty cheap.
You can get 1 kg of nano Zeolite for $20:
A ton (900 kgs) of nano zinc for $1500:
1 kg of nano titanium dioxide for $30.
🤡 99.9% of nano-sized zeolite is synthetic because creating true nanoparticles from geodes is extraordinarily difficult.
Zeolite is not a geode. Zeolite is inherently nanostructured and therefore a nanomaterial for toxicological and chemical purposes.
Touchstone PBX and HCS Masterpeace are marketed as natural nano-sized Zeolite supplements… is Mr. Guru implying that these companies are lying?
Masterpeace:
Touchstone:
ResultsRNA ACZ Nano Zeolite is also implied to be natural.
🤡 The confusion stems from conflating synthetic versus natural sources. Two completely different materials.
Are they?
Let’s see.
Dear DisclosureHub
I’m concerned that your financial interests are clouding your vision.
I am also concerned for your health and cognitive abilities. Eating aluminum is very bad for your health.
Even more importantly, tens of thousands of people follow you, and you have a duty of care to them.
Ignoring the lengthy array of falsehoods you stated — you have a moral, professional and ethical duty to pure-heartedly investigate Zeolite toxicity.
If in your mind there is even a 1% chance you are incorrect, you are obligated to look into it. No Big Pharma Dance gaslighting, no logical fallacies, just the basic fundamentals of Zeolite being a nano aluminum silicate, utilised in questionable industrial applications such as carrots & biosensors while being funded by Big Petrol and Big Pharma.
When you realise that eating nanostructured aluminum is very dangerous please join us in speaking out against Zeolite. Disavow Zeolite as strongly as you promote it.
And if you wish to continue promoting the nano aluminum silicate known as Zeolite at the very least attempt to do the following:
provide valid information on how Green Mountain Greenery’s Zeolite is dealuminated without being destroyed, the dealumination percentage and analysis to confirm that the structure is still viable
provide toxicology/safety data for dealuminated Clinoptilolite
ensure your research references are relevant to your claims
stop trying to gaslight people on the definition of words such as ‘nanomaterial’ and ‘geode’ because that clearly isn’t going to work anymore
stop spreading misleading information regarding the FDA GRAS approval of Zeolite and the EU approval of E568
stop propagating damaging nanoscale definitions developed by the FDA & NNI
learn the meaning of words such as veterinary and anemia — and ensure you use them appropriately in sentences
And most importantly:
For your own sake, please do 10 seconds of research before responding with your talking points.
So the next time you choose to write about Zeolite — do some research — learn the meaning of words such as ‘nanomaterial’ and then answer the question. No irrelevant fallacies, no unrelated research links, no Big Pharma Dance gaslighting…
Explain why ingesting a nano aluminum silicate utilised in highly questionable industrial applications such as carrots, drug delivery and biosensors while being funded and promoted by Big Petrol and Big Pharma is healthy.
Brandolini’s law
Mr. Guru’s comments are a perfect example of false-info asymmetry. It presumably took Mr. Guru less than an hour to write these comments. Yet it took around 10 days of writing and additional research to debunk his mess of confusion.
In this article, we dissected and exposed many Zeolite-related fallacies, doublespeak illusions and irrelevant falsehoods.
When Zeolite Zealots churn out scientific-sounding lies in large quantity they construct a mire of confusion and fallacies that the average truther will find exceedingly difficult to wade through.
The average consumer that is still undecided about Zeolite will likely be convinced that this set of cool-sounding word salad is valid… and thus Zeolite must be safe.
I hope you can see how these propaganda tactics are used to confuse and convince:
Propaganda technique featuring rapid, repetitive and overwhelming talking points with no regard for truth or facts.
Illusory Truth Effect/Reiteration Effect
Bias where we believe false information the more it is repeated to us.
“If you tell a lie long enough, it becomes the truth.” - Joseph Goebbels (allegedly)Woozle Effect/Evidence by Citation
This is an effect that occurs when information is falsely attributed to a citation — and the false information is spread because people do not check to see if the citation supports the information.
Finally, I’ll add some very interesting quotes about endlessly repeating propaganda:
“[…] the mere reiteration of an idea would create a conviction. Suppose the old type of salesmanship, acting for a meat packer, was seeking to increase the sale of bacon. It would reiterate innumerable times in full-page advertisements ‘Eat more bacon. […]
- Propaganda by Edward L. Bernays
One of the most remarkable weapons of the authoritarian State is propaganda that neutralizes and paralyzes its opponents (or all of public opinion) by reiterating a simple set of “truths” - Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes by Ellul Jacques
Conclusion
Mr. Guru bombarded us with unsubstantiated claims and irrelevant references and I have meticulously addressed every single point.
I remain open to public debate and open to receiving new information and evidence.
This is for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.
Please do your research, and be safe ❤️
Check out the video form of this article:
Or on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v74j5ju-disclosurehub-is-mad-at-zac-and-d-booma-san.-slaying-zeolite-zealots-round-.html
Please share, we need to spread this message everywhere… so many people have been hurt. Enough is enough… let’s share the truth and protect each other.
I have 70+ posts about Zeolite on Telegram: https://t.me/powerofthepulse
More about Zeolite:
The Big Pharma Dance:
https://powerofthepulse.substack.com/i/169764493/zeolite-faq
I cant believe you got all of this on here ---you re just zeolite terrorist ---trying to stop the stupid from ingesting nanometals that could self assemble and cause untold mutations in the body the least which can assemble into circuitry that thus aluminumsilcate material would be utilized in the assembly of circuitry within the body not to mention the genetic damge this causes and ---the issue you re having---the brain damage its apparently doing as well --you re dealing with the brain damaged from using this make believe miracle metal(s) that adsorb and increase toxicity which if not removed further translocates throughout the body and when freq activated this wonder dunder causes chaos---simplestinc terms for the brain addled zeolite people ---what happens when you hit aluminum with a microwave??? and what happens when you hit aluminum and silica together ina microwave--- test the theory put a shot glass full of your zeolite and then cover it with a pyrex so it doesnt splatter ---what do you seeeeeeee---OOoooOOOooo what a rush this goes on everytime you use your cell phone or are exposed to high level emr ----and if this doesnt convince you ---put zac in your will --HAHAHHA
There is an opportunity to see if Zeolite can be traced or tracked, (which is what is being used so that we can be).
This Guru had no concern about a nursing mother and the possibility of the baby getting any aluminum, and or residue from feeding while she was taking his product. I propose we ask for a breast milk analysis.
Could that help collect data points? A mother who is nursing while taking zeolite, simple enough, a breast milk sample. Where is the proof it does or doesn't leave the body has yet to be shown. Would it answer the question. I'd like to know because for now, no one does.
We should all do our own research because long-run, if we knew then maybe we'd stop exposing our kitties to Zeolite because their health and well-being counts as well.
Good work, Zac. Keep it coming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVeFZJdtpNg